Loading... Please wait...Connecting to intelligent information in the electronic age.
New Publications
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter- 1: SUMMARY
SUMMARY TABLE VALUE CUMULATIVE CAPITAL BASE OF CARBON CAPTURE TECHNOLOGIES, THROUGH 2012 ($ BILLIONS) |
SUMMARY FIGURE CUMULATIVE CAPITAL BASE FOR CARBON CAPTURE TECHNOLOGIES WORLDWIDE, 2005-2012 ($ BILLIONS) |
Chapter- 2: OVERVIEW
TECHNOLOGIES EXAMINED |
USERS OF THE CARBON CAPTURE TECHNOLOGIES |
OTHER FACTORS |
TABLE 1 COMPARISON COST OF ELECTRICITY WITH CARBON CAPTURE TECHNOLOGY, 2007 |
FIGURE 1 COST PER KWH FOR CARBON CAPTURE TECHNOLOGY, 2007 |
Chapter- 3: PRE-COMBUSTION: INTEGRATED GASIFICATION COMBINED CYCLE
TABLE 2 WORLDWIDE IGCC PLANT GROWTH PROJECTIONS: SYNGAS PRODUCTION VS ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION, THROUGH 2012 (MWTH* VS MWE**) |
TABLE 3 WORLDWIDE IGCC PLANT GROWTH PROJECTIONS: CUMULATIVE VALUE OF SYNGAS AND ELECTRIC PLANTS, THROUGH 2012 ($ BILLIONS) |
FIGURE 2 WORLDWIDE IGCC PLANT APPLICATION PROJECTIONS: SYNGAS VS ELECTRICITY, 2005-2012 ($ BILLIONS) |
IGCC ELECTRIC POWER PLANTS |
TABLE 4 U.S. AND ROW IGCC CAPITAL BASE PROJECTIONS, THROUGH 2012 ($ BILLIONS) |
TABLE 5 PROJECTED U.S. AND ROW IGCC MEGAWATT BASE FOR POWER, THROUGH 2012 (MW) |
TABLE 6 U.S. POWER FROM TRADITIONAL COAL PLANTS VS IGCC COAL PLANTS, 2007 (MW) |
FIGURE 3 U.S. MARKET SHARES OF ELECTRIC POWER: TRADITIONAL COAL-FIRED VS. IGCC COAL POWER, 2007 (MW) |
IGCC APPLICATION MARKET |
Chapter- 4: IGCC APPLICATION DISTRIBUTION
FIGURE 4 IGCC TECHNOLOGY APPLICATIONS, 2007 (%) |
FIGURE 5 UTILITY GASIFICATION PROJECT MARKET SHARES |
BY COMPANY, 2007 |
TABLE 7 IGCC APPLICATION MARKET SHARES, 2007 |
TECHNOLOGY DISTRIBUTION |
FIGURE 6 IGCC MARKET SHARES BY COMPANY SYNGAS PRODUCTION, 2007 (%) |
TABLE 8 GASIFICATION COMPANY MARKET SHARES BY SYNGAS OUTPUT AND NUMBER OF PROJECTS, 2007 (NM3/D) |
TABLE 9 PROJECTED U.S. AND REST OF WORLD IGCC MEGAWATT BASE FOR POWER, THROUGH 2012 (MW/NO. OF PROJECTS) |
FIGURE 7 PROJECTED U.S. AND REST OF WORLD IGCC GROWTH, 2005-2012 (MW) |
TABLE 10 PLANNED MEGAWATTS OF IGCC POWER PLANTS WORLDWIDE BY COUNTRY, 2012 (MW) |
FIGURE 8 WORLDWIDE IGCC MARKET SHARE PROJECTIONS BY COUNTRY BASED ON MEGAWATT CAPACITY, 2012 (%) |
IGCC APPLICATIONS: US IGCC PLANTS AND PROJECTS |
TABLE 11 U.S. IGCC PLANTS, 1995-2012 |
TABLE 12 POST-2012 U.S. ANNOUNCED U.S. IGCC PROJECTS |
REST OF WORLD IGCC PROJECTS |
TABLE 13 REST OF WORLD IGCC PROJECTS, TO 2012 |
TABLE 14 POST-2012 REST OF WORLD IGCC PROJECTS |
IGCC TECHNOLOGY |
TABLE 15 COAL PLANT EFFICIENCY COMPARISON OF IGCC, SUBCRITICAL PC, SUPERCRITICAL PC, AND ULTRA SUPERCRITICAL PC BY COAL TYPE (%) |
IGCC MAJOR COMPONENTS |
TABLE 16 MAJOR IGCC COMPONENTS: COST AND PLANT FUNCTION (%) |
Coal Handling Equipment |
Gasifier |
Moving-Bed Reactors |
Fluidized-Bed Reactors |
Circulating Fluidized Bed Combustion |
Entrained-Flow Reactors |
Syngas Cleanup |
Combined Cycle Power Block |
Balance of IGCC Plant |
TABLE 17 WORLDWIDE MARKET PROJECTIONS FOR ON-SITE PRE-COMBUSTION COMPONENTS, THROUGH 2012 ($ MILLIONS) |
FIGURE 9 SCHEMATIC IGCC PROCESS |
METHODS OF MANUFACTURE |
NEW DEVELOPMENTS |
PROCESS ECONOMICS |
TABLE 18 AVERAGE NGCC, PC, AND IGCC POWER PLANT CAPITAL COSTS WITHOUT AND WITH CO2 CAPTURE, 2007 ($/MILLION MW) |
PROCESS COMPARISON |
TABLE 19 ENVIRONMENTAL ADVANTAGES OF IGCC VS BEST PC |
TABLE 20 COMPARISON OF IGCC, SUBCRITICAL PC, AND SUPERCRITICAL PC CO2 EMISSIONS (LB/MWH) |
TABLE 21 COMPARISON OF GE, CONOCOPHILLIPS, AND SHELL TECHNOLOGIES COSTS AND EFFICIENCY |
PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT |
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVANTAGES |
TABLE 22 IGCC ENVIRONMENTAL ATTRIBUTES |
TABLE 22 (CONTINUED) |
TABLE 23 IGCC VS PC WITH ADVANCED POLLUTION CONTROLS ENVIRONMENTAL COMPARISON |
INDUSTRY STRUCTURE AND COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS |
TABLE 24 WORLDWIDE PROJECTED MARKET SHARES OF IGCC FOR ELECTRICITY BY MARKET LEADER, 2007-2012 |
FIGURE 10 WORLDWIDE PROJECTED COMPANY MARKET SHARES OF IGCC ELECTRIC PROJECTS, 2007-2012 (%) |
INDUSTRY DRIVERS |
TABLE 25 IGCC INDUSTRY DRIVERS VS INHIBITORS |
STRATEGIES |
SHIFTS |
TRADE PRACTICES |
EVOLUTION OF THE INDUSTRY |
TABLE 26 PRE-COMBUSTION TECHNOLOGY HISTORY, 1812–2007 |
TABLE 26 (CONTINUED) |
INDUSTRY IMPACTS |
REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT |
IMPORTANCE OF PATENTS |
Patents by Application |
TABLE 27 U.S. CO2 CAPTURE PATENTS BY APPLICATION TYPE, 2004–2007 |
FIGURE 11 U.S. CO2 CAPTURE PATENTS BY APPLICATION, 2004–2007 (%) |
Patent Technology by Region |
TABLE 28 U.S. CO2 PATENTS BY REGION, 2002–2007 |
FIGURE 12 U.S. CO2 PATENTS BY REGION, 2002–2007 (%) |
Patents by Year |
TABLE 29 U.S. PATENTS BY YEAR, 2004–2007 |
IMPORTANCE OF RESEARCH |
Chapter- 5: OXY-FUEL COMBUSTION CARBON CAPTURE
TABLE 30 WORLDWIDE OXYGEN APPLICATION MARKETS, 2007 ($ BILLIONS) |
FIGURE 13 WORLDWIDE MARKET SHARES OF OXYGEN APPLICATIONS, 2007 (%) |
TABLE 31 U.S. AND WORLD OXYGEN MARKET PROJECTIONS, THROUGH 2012 ($ BILLIONS/BCF/MMT) |
TECHNOLOGY MARKET FOR OXY-FUEL COMBUSTION CARBON CAPTURE |
TABLE 32 PROJECTED WORLDWIDE UTILITY MARKET FOR COMBUSTION TECHNOLOGY PRODUCTS, THROUGH 2012 ($ BILLIONS) |
APPLICATION MARKET OXY-FUEL |
TABLE 33 OXY-FUEL PROJECTS WORLDWIDE, 1997–2008 |
TABLE 34 PROJECTED OXY-FUEL PROJECTS WORLDWIDE, 2007–2012 |
TABLE 34 (CONTINUED) |
APPLICATION MARKET OXY-FUEL (CONTINUED) |
OXY-COMBUSTION TECHNOLOGY |
MAJOR OXY-FUEL POWER GENERATION COMPONENTS |
TABLE 35 MAJOR OXY-COMBUSTION COMPONENT COSTS, 2007 (%) |
Air Separation Unit |
Boiler-Turbine-Generator |
CO2 Cooler/Condenser/Compressor |
Air Pollution Controls |
FIGURE 14 SCHEMATIC OXY-FUEL SYSTEM |
PROCESS ECONOMICS |
TABLE 36 COST OF STATE OF THE ART 740 MW PC OXY-COMBUSTION PLANT WITH CO2 CAPTURE, 2007 |
TABLE 37 ULTRA-SUPERCRITICAL OXY-FUEL COSTS COMPARED WITH SUPERCRITICAL AND ULTRA-SUPERCRITICAL |
TABLE 38 OXY-FUEL COMPONENT COE, 2007 (C/KWH/%) |
FIGURE 15 COE FOR OXY-FUEL POWER PLANT BY COMPONENT, 2007 (%) |
PROCESS COMPARISON |
TABLE 39 ULTRA-SUPERCRITICAL OXY-FUEL PERFORMANCE COMPARED WITH SUPERCRITICAL AND ULTRA-SUPERCRITICAL |
TABLE 40 AUXILIARY POWER LOSS FOR OXY-FUEL POWER PLANT |
FIGURE 16 OXY-FUEL AVERAGE AUXILIARY POWER LOSS PER MW, 2007 (%) |
PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT |
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVANTAGES |
TABLE 41 OXY-FUEL ENVIRONMENTAL ADVANTAGES |
INDUSTRY STRUCTURE AND COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS: COMBUSTION |
INDUSTRY MARKET SHARES |
TABLE 42 OXY-FUEL FOR UTILITY APPLICATIONS MARKET SHARES, 2007 ($ MILLIONS) |
FIGURE 17 OXY-FUEL FOR UTILITY APPLICATIONS MARKET SHARES, 2007 (%) |
INDUSTRY DRIVERS |
TABLE 43 OXY-FUEL INDUSTRY DRIVERS VS INHIBITORS |
STRATEGIES |
SHIFTS |
TRADE PRACTICES |
EVOLUTION OF THE INDUSTRY |
TABLE 44 HISTORY OF THE INDUSTRY: MAJOR DEVELOPMENTS |
TABLE 44 (CONTINUED) |
INDUSTRY IMPACTS |
REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT |
PATENTS |
IMPORTANCE OF RESEARCH |
TABLE 45 OXY-FUEL RESEARCH NEEDS |
Chapter- 6: POST-COMBUSTION CARBON CAPTURE
TECHNOLOGY MARKET FOR POST-COMBUSTION CCS |
TABLE 46 PROJECTED WORLDWIDE VALUE OF POST COMBUSTION STORAGE PROJECTS AND ONGOING EOR, THROUGH 2012 ($ BILLIONS) |
POST COMBUSTION RECOVERY APPLICATION MARKET |
TABLE 47 PROJECTED WORLDWIDE VALUE OF CO2 CAPTURE PROJECTS, CO2 CAPTURE, AND VALUE OF CO2, THROUGH 2012 |
FIGURE 18 PROJECTED WORLDWIDE MARKET SHARE OF CCS TECHNOLOGIES BY COUNTRY AND METRIC TONS OF CO2 CAPTURED, 2012 (%) |
TABLE 48 CARBON CAPTURE PROJECTS BY COUNTRY, 2012 (MMT/YR OF CO2 CAPTURED) |
TABLE 49 PROJECTED U.S. AND FOREIGN CO2 STORAGE PROJECTS, 2007–2012 ($ MILLIONS) |
TECHNOLOGY: CHEMICAL STRIPPING |
FIGURE 19 SCHEMATIC OF POWER GENERATION AND CO2 SEQUESTRATION |
MAJOR POST-COMBUSTION CCS CHEMICAL STRIPPING COMPONENTS |
Flue Gas Supply/SO2 polishing |
CO2 Absorption |
Circulating Water System |
Water Wash Section |
Rich/Lean Amine Heat Exchange System |
Solvent Stripper |
Solvent Stripper Reclaimer |
Steam Condensate |
Corrosion Inhibitor System |
Gas Compression and Drying System |
FIGURE 20 SCHEMATIC OF AN AMINE TREATMENT SYSTEM |
PROCESS ECONOMICS |
TABLE 50 AMINE SCRUBBING COSTS COMPARED WITH SUPERCRITICAL AND ULTRA-SUPERCRITICAL |
TABLE 51 AMINE CCS COMPONENT COST OF ELECTRICITY KWH AND PERCENTAGE OF COE KWH |
FIGURE 21 AMINE CCS COMPONENT COST OF ELECTRICITY (%) |
TABLE 52 CAPITAL COSTS FOR A 720 MW COAL POWER PLANT, 6,000 MT CO2 A DAY CCS RETROFIT, 2007 |
FIGURE 22 COST SHARES BY MAJOR COMPONENT FOR 720 MW CHP, 2007 (%) |
PROCESS COMPARISONS |
TABLE 53 ULTRA-SUPERCRITICAL AMINE PERFORMANCE COMPARED WITH SUPERCRITICAL AND ULTRA-SUPERCRITICAL |
AMMONIA CCS TECHNOLOGY |
FIGURE 23 AMMONIA CO2 STRIPPER FOR COPRODUCTION OF PRODUCTS |
Process Economics |
TABLE 54 COST COMPARISON OF AA WITH MEA FOR PC AND USC |
Process Comparison |
TABLE 55 MEA VS AA PERFORMANCE COMPARISON |
TABLE 56 VALUE-ADDED PRODUCTS FROM AMMONIA POLLUTION CONTROLS FOR NOX, SOX, AND GD (OPERATING AT 80% OF CAPACITY) |
TABLE 57 MEA VS AMMONIA BTU REQUIREMENTS |
Product Development |
INDUSTRY DRIVERS |
TABLE 58 INDUSTRY DRIVERS VS INHIBITORS |
SHIFTS |
STRATEGIES |
TRADE PRACTICES |
EVOLUTION OF THE INDUSTRY |
TABLE 59 EVOLUTION OF POST COMBUSTION INDUSTRY |
PATENTS FACTORS |
IMPORTANCE OF RESEARCH |
CHEMICALS FOR POST-COMBUSTION CARBON CAPTURING PROCESS |
SORBENTS |
INDUSTRY STRUCTURE AND COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS: POST-COMBUSTION |
TABLE 60 WORLDWIDE NUMBER OF CHEMICAL-BASED CARBON CAPTURE PLANT INSTALLATIONS BY COMPANY, 2007 |
FIGURE 24 WORLDWIDE MARKET SHARES OF CARBON CAPTURE MATERIALS BY COMPANY, 2007 (%) |
TABLE 61 WORLDWIDE PRODUCT MARKET SHARES OF SOLVENTS FOR CCS, 2007 ($ BILLIONS) |
FIGURE 25 WORLDWIDE PRODUCT MARKET SHARES CO2 ADSORBENTS, 2007 (%) |
Trends in Ethanolamine Demand |
TABLE 62 PROJECTED WORLDWIDE PRODUCTION OF ETHANOLAMINE, THROUGH 2012 (MMT AND $ BILLIONS) |
TABLE 63 WORLDWIDE ETHANOLAMINE PRODUCTION BY REGION, 2007 (MT) |
FIGURE 26 WORLDWIDE ETHANOLAMINE PRODUCTION BY REGION, 2007 (%) |
FIGURE 27 WORLDWIDE ETHANOLAMINE MARKET SHARES BY COMPANY, 2007 (%) |
TABLE 64 PROJECTED WORLDWIDE MARKET FOR ETHANOLAMINE APPLICATIONS, THROUGH 2012 (MMT) |
Ethanolamine Production |
TABLE 65 WORLDWIDE ETHANOLAMINE PRODUCTION MARKET SHARE BY COMPANY, 2007 |
CHEMICAL SOLVENT/ORGANICS: AMINE-BASED |
Monoethanolamine |
Amine Guard |
Amino-Di-Ethylene-Glycol (ADEG) |
Activated Methyldiethanolamine (aDMEA) |
Amisol Mix |
Diisopropylamine |
Diethanolamine /SNPA-DEA |
Econamine FG Process |
Estasolvan |
Flexsorb |
Fluor Solvent |
Glymine |
Applications |
KS-1, KS-2, and KS-3 |
MDEA and Hybrid Solvents |
Omnisulf |
Sterically Hindered Amines |
PHYSICAL SOLVENTS |
Alkazid |
Morphysorb |
Optisol |
Potassium Carbonate/Benfield |
TABLE 66 POTASSIUM CARBONATE PROCESS ADVANTAGES |
PuraTreat R and F |
Purisol |
Rectisol |
Selefining |
Selexol |
SEPASOLV MPE |
Sulfinol |
UCARSOL |
PROCESS/SOLVENT COMPARISON |
TABLE 67 COMPARISON OF CO2 SORBENT MATERIAL QUALITIES |
Chapter- 7: MAJOR MARKETS FOR CARBON CAPTURE STORAGE AND TECHNOLOGIES
TABLE 68 PROJECTED WORLDWIDE MAJOR APPLICATION MARKETS FOR CCS TECHNOLOGY, THROUGH 2012 ($ BILLIONS) |
TABLE 69 PROJECTED CO2 CONSUMPTION WORLDWIDE BY APPLICATION, THROUGH 2012 ($ BILLIONS) |
TABLE 70 CO2 CONSUMED WORLDWIDE BY MAJOR APPLICATION, 2007 (MMT) |
FIGURE 28 WORLDWIDE MARKET SHARES BY MAJOR APPLICATION BY CO2 CONSUMED, 2007 (MMT OF CO2) |
TABLE 71 PROJECTED WORLDWIDE CO2 CONSUMED BY OIL, CHEMICAL, MERCHANT, AND CARBON MARKETS, THROUGH 2012 (MMT) |
TABLE 72 PROJECTED WORLDWIDE CO2 CONSUMED BY OIL, CHEMICAL, AND MERCHANT MARKETS, THROUGH 2012 ($ BILLIONS) |
TABLE 73 MILLION METRIC TONS OF CO2 CONSUMED WORLDWIDE BY MAJOR MARKET, 2007 ($ BILLIONS) |
FIGURE 29 WORLDWIDE CO2 MARKET BY APPLICATION, 2007 (%) |
ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION |
TABLE 74 WORLDWIDE APPLICATIONS OF CARBON CAPTURE SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES AND ELECTRIC GROWTH PROJECTIONS, THROUGH 2012 |
TABLE 75 PROJECTED MW INCREASE IN CARBON CAPTURE SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES WORLDWIDE, THROUGH 2012 (MW IN MILLIONS) |
TABLE 76 PROJECTED WORLDWIDE POWER CAPACITY WITH AND WITHOUT CARBON CAPTURE SYSTEMS BY TYPE, 2012 (MW MILLIONS) |
FIGURE 30 WORLD MW CAPACITY VS CCS MW TECHNOLOGIES, 2012 (%) |
TABLE 77 PROJECTED UTILITY WORLDWIDE MARKETS FOR CARBON CAPTURE TECHNOLOGY BY TYPE, THROUGH 2012 ($ BILLIONS) |
TABLE 78 PROJECTED WORLDWIDE CCS AND TECHNOLOGY MARKET SHARES AND SOURCES OF CO2, 2012 ($ BILLIONS) |
FIGURE 31 WORLD ELECTRIC POWER MARKET SHARES BY REGION, 2007 (%) |
FIGURE 32 REGIONAL SHARES OF WORLDWIDE CO2 EMISSIONS, 2007 (%) |
MARKET TRENDS |
TABLE 79 POTENTIAL VALUE OF CCS TECHNOLOGIES FOR ELECTRIC POWER APPLICATIONS WORLDWIDE, THROUGH 2012 (MW/$MILLIONS) |
TABLE 80 PROJECTED U.S. MARKET SHARES OF CCS TECHNOLOGIES FOR COAL POWER, 2012 (GW) |
FIGURE 33 PROJECTED U.S. CARBON CAPTURE TECHNOLOGIES COAL MARKET SHARES BY MW, 2012 (%) |
PROCESS ECONOMICS |
REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT |
TABLE 81 CCS TECHNOLOGY MARKETS BY TYPE, 2007 (NUMBER OF SITES/MMT) |
FIGURE 34 BEST APPLICATION MARKETS FOR CCS BY INDUSTRY, THROUGH 2012 (%) |
TABLE 82 COST OF CO2 FROM INDUSTRIAL SOURCES, 2007 ($/MT) |
FIGURE 35 COST PER MT OF CO2 FROM INDUSTRIAL SOURCES, 2007 ($/MT) |
TABLE 83 VALUE OF CCS GIGA METRIC TONS (GMT) CO2 REDUCTION AND VALUE TO 2050 |
FIGURE 36 PROJECTED DISTRIBUTION OF CARBON CAPTURE SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY WORLDWIDE, 2050 (%) |
FIGURE 36 (CONTINUED) |
NATURAL GAS PROCESSING |
TABLE 84 PROJECTED WORLDWIDE APPLICATION MARKETS FOR POST-COMBUSTION SOLVENT SYSTEMS, THROUGH 2012 ($ BILLIONS) |
TABLE 85 VALUE POST-COMBUSTION TECHNOLOGIES, 2007 ($ BILLIONS) |
FIGURE 37 APPLICATION MARKET FOR CO2 CAPTURE SYSTEMS UTILITY VS GAS PROCESSING, 2007 (%) |
TABLE 86 PROJECTED NATURAL GAS CONSUMED, SCRUBBED GAS, CO2 CONTENT WORLDWIDE, THROUGH 2012 (TCF) |
TABLE 87 PROJECTED VALUE OF CO2 ANTI-CORROSION FOR PIPELINE TRANSMISSION WORLDWIDE, THROUGH 2012 |
FIGURE 38 AMINE GAS SWEETENING PLANT |
TABLE 88 U.S. GAS PROCESSING PLANTS BY STATE, 2007 (MMSCF/D) |
FIGURE 39 U.S. MARKET FOR GAS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY BY STATE, 2007 (%) |
FIGURE 40 MAJOR INDUSTRIAL SOURCES OF 1.3 BCF/D CO2 FOR EOR, 2007 (%) |
TABLE 89 NON-NATURAL CO2 SOURCES FOR EOR, 2007 (MMCF/D) |
TABLE 90 MAJOR U.S. PIPELINE EXPANSIONS AND SCRUBBING VALUES, 2006–2008 ($ MILLIONS) |
HYDROGEN |
TABLE 91 GLOBAL DAILY HYDROGEN PRODUCTION BY FEEDSTOCK, 2007 |
TABLE 92 GLOBAL HYDROGEN AND CO2 PRODUCTION FROM COAL AND GAS, 2007 |
ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY |
TABLE 93 PROJECTED WORLD OIL PRODUCTION FROM EOR AND CO2 USE, THROUGH 2012 |
FIGURE 41 PROJECTED WORLDWIDE CO2 CONSUMPTION IN EOR, THROUGH 2012 (MILLION METRIC TONS) |
TABLE 94 U.S. AND CANADIAN CO2 EOR BARREL OF OIL EQUIVALENT PER DAY, 2007 |
TABLE 95 U.S. RECOVERABLE BARRELS OF OIL USING CO2 INJECTION BY REGION, 2007 (BB/TCF) |
FIGURE 42 PROJECTED U.S. REGIONAL MARKETS FOR CO2 FOR EOR BY RECOVERABLE BARRELS OF OIL, 2012 (%) |
NATURAL CO2 RESERVOIRS |
TABLE 96 U.S. CO2 RESERVES PROVEN AND PROBABLE, 2007 |
FIGURE 43 U.S. NATURAL CO2 RESERVOIR MARKET SHARES, 2007 (%) |
Bravo Dome |
Doe Canyon |
Jackson Dome |
McElmo Dome |
TRANSPORT OF CO2 |
FIGURE 44 U.S. CO2 PIPELINES |
PIPELINES |
TABLE 97 U.S. CO2 PIPELINE AND TRANSPORT COSTS, 2007 |
TABLE 98 SUMMARY OF MAJOR U.S. CO2 PIPELINES, 2007 |
Bravo Pipeline |
Centerline |
Canyon Reef Carriers |
Central Basin Pipeline |
Cortez Pipeline |
Este Pipeline |
Pecos Pipeline |
Powder River Basin |
Sheep Mountain Pipeline |
Slaughter Pipeline |
Val Verde |
West Texas Pipeline and the Llano Lateral |
Calgary Alberta CO2 Pipeline |
PIPELINE LEGISLATION |
TECHNOLOGY FOR CO2 PUMPED EOR |
IMPORTANCE OF RESEARCH |
CO2 EOR MARKET POTENTIAL |
CRUDE OIL MARKET POTENTIAL |
TABLE 99 CO2 DAILY DELIVERIES FOR EOR BY COMPANY, 2008 (MMCF) |
FIGURE 45 CO2 DELIVERIES TO THE EOR MARKET BY MAJOR COMPANY, 2007 (%) |
PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT |
MARKET COMPETITION |
EOR HISTORY AND PROJECTIONS |
TABLE 100 COST PER BARREL OF OIL USING CO2 EOR FLOODING, 2007 ($) |
FIGURE 46 COST SHARES PER BARREL OF OIL FOR CO2 EOR, 2007 (%) |
TABLE 101 VALUE OF EOR TO TEXAS ECONOMY, 2007 ($) |
TABLE 102 VALUE NEW TEXAS CO2 EOR PROJECTS, 2006–2007 ($ BILLIONS) |
FIGURE 47 SHARES OF NEW TEXAS CO2 EOR PROJECTS BY COMPANY, 2006-2007 (%) |
TABLE 103 NEW EOR PROJECTS IN TEXAS, 2006–2007 |
TABLE 104 PROJECTED U.S AND CANADIAN BARRELS OF OIL EQUIVALENT A DAY AND CO2 REQUIRED PER DAY, THROUGH 2012 |
TABLE 105 ONGOING CO2 FLOODING IN EOR PROJECTS IN THE U.S. AND REST OF WORLD, 2007 |
TABLE 106 REST OF WORLD EOR PROJECTS: OPERATING AND UNDER CONSIDERATION, 2007 |
CO2 MERCHANT MARKET |
TABLE 107 WORLWIDE PROJECTED CO2 PRODUCTION, THROUGH 2012 (MMT) |
TABLE 108 CO2 STATISTICS BY MAJOR COMPANY, 2007 |
FIGURE 48 WORLDWIDE MERCHANT CO2 MARKET SHARES BY MAJOR COMPANY, 2007 |
TABLE 109 NORTH AMERICAN CO2 MERCHANT SALES, 2007 |
FIGURE 49 NORTH AMERICAN MERCHANT CO2 SALES BY FORM, 2007 (%) |
TABLE 110 PROJECTED U.S. CO2 PRODUCTION FROM ETHANOL PRODUCTION, THROUGH 2012 (MMT) |
TABLE 111 PROJECTED WORLDWIDE MERCHANT CO2 CONSUMPTION BY REGION, THROUGH 2012 (MMT) |
ETHANOL AND CO2 COPRODUCTION |
TABLE 112 PROJECTED U.S. ETHANOL PRODUCTION AND CO2 COPRODUCT, THROUGH 2012 |
TABLE 113 WORLDWIDE CO2 MERCHANT MARKET BY REGION, 2007 |
FIGURE 50 WORLDWIDE MERCHANT CO2 MARKET SHARES BY REGION, 2007 (%) |
TABLE 114 CO2 APPLICATIONS |
TABLE 115 CO2 APPLICATIONS, THROUGH 2012 (MMT) |
FIGURE 51 WORLDWIDE MERCHANT CO2 MARKET SHARES BY APPLICATION TYPE, 2007 |
Beverages |
Dry Cleaning and Industrial Cleaning |
TABLE 116 APPLICATION MARKETS FOR CO2 CLEANING BY REGION, 2007 |
Electronics Industry |
Food |
Inerting |
Other Uses |
Pharmaceutical |
Refrigeration |
TABLE 117 REFRIGERATION USES OF CARBON DIOXIDE, 2007 |
Water Treatment |
Welding |
THE CARBON MARKET |
TABLE 118 VALUE CARBON MARKET, MMT CO2 AVOIDED, MMT CO2 CAPTURED, TECHNOLOGY, THROUGH 2012 ($ BILLIONS) |
FIGURE 52 PROJECTED VALUE OF THE CARBON MARKET, 2005-2012 ($ BILLIONS) |
TABLE 119 PROJECTED VALUE OF CO2 CAPTURE PROJECTS AND METRIC TONS, THROUGH 2012 |
TABLE 120 PROJECTED IGCC CO2 POTENTIAL FOR EMISSION CREDITS VS PC AND SPC POWER PLANTS, THROUGH 2012 |
TABLE 121 IGCC, SUBCRITICAL PC AND SUPERCRITICAL PC CO2 |
EMISSIONS COMPARISON (LBS/MWH) |
CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM |
TABLE 122 CO2 GROWTH AND VALUE, THROUGH 2012 |
PROJECT-BASED TRANSACTIONS |
CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM |
TABLE 123 WORLDWIDE CDM CREDIT SOURCES BY COUNTRY AND REGION (%) |
FIGURE 53 WORLDWIDE SOURCES OF CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM PROJECTS BY COUNTRY/REGION (%) |
REMOVAL UNITS |
EMISSION REDUCTION CREDITS |
CERTIFIED EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS |
EUROPEAN UNION ALLOWANCES |
GREEN TAGS |
JI PROJECTS |
Chapter- 8: RESEARCH
TABLE 124 WORLDWIDE CO2 RESEARCH SPENDING BY REGION, 2007 ($ MILLIONS) |
FIGURE 54 RESEARCH SPENDING WORLDWIDE FOR CO2 CAPTURE BY REGION, 2007 (%) |
UNITED STATES |
TABLE 125 OVERVIEW VALUE OF U.S. CO2 MITIGATION RESEARCH PROGRAMS, 2007 ($ MILLIONS/%) |
TABLE 125 (CONTINUED) |
FIGURE 55 DOE SPONSORED RESEARCH TO REDUCE CO2 EMISSIONS BE RESEARCH AREA, 2007 (%) |
ADVANCED RESEARCH |
Advanced Turbines |
Basic Energy Sciences |
Biomass and Biorefinery Systems |
Carbon Sequestration |
Clean Coal Power Initiative |
Climate Change Research |
FutureGen |
Fuels and Power Systems |
Genomes: GTL Research |
Hydrogen Technology |
Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle |
EUROPEAN UNION |
CHINA-EU/COACH |
GERMANY |
NORWAY |
CHINA |
JAPAN |
AUSTRALIA |
REST OF WORLD |
RESEARCH BY TECHNOLOGY |
TABLE 126 PROJECTED VALUE OF CARBON CAPTURE TECHNOLOGY MATERIALS RESEARCH, THROUGH 2012 ($ MILLIONS) |
TABLE 127 CCS MATERIALS RESEARCH MARKET BY APPLICATION, 2007 ($ MILLIONS) |
FIGURE 56 CARBON CAPTURE SYSTEMS MATERIALS RESEARCH MARKET SHARES BY APPLICATION, 2007 (%) |
COMBUSTORS/TURBINES |
TABLE 128 VALUE OF COMBUSTOR/TURBINE RESEARCH PROJECTS ($ MILLIONS) |
TABLE 129 VALUE MEMBRANE RESEARCH, 2007 ($ MILLIONS) |
ZEOLITES |
TABLE 130 VALUE OF ZEOLITE RESEARCH FOR CO2 CAPTURE, 2007 ($ MILLIONS) |
SILICATES |
TABLE 131 DATA ON SILICATE RESEARCH INVESTIGATORS FOR CARBON CAPTURE, 2007 ($ MILLIONS) |
IONIC LIQUIDS |
TABLE 132 VALUE IONIC LIQUIDS RESEARCH FOR CO2 CAPTURE, 2007 ($ MILLIONS) |
OTHER CO2 ABSORBENT MATERIALS |
TABLE 133 VALUE OTHER CO2 ABSORBENT MATERIALS RESEARCH, 2007 ($ MILLIONS) |
LARGE-SCALE CARBON SEQUESTRATION RESEARCH PROJECTS |
TABLE 134 VALUE OF U.S. CO2 GEOLOGIC STORAGE PROJECTS, 2007 ($ MILLIONS) |
BIG SKY REGIONAL CARBON SEQUESTRATION PARTNERSHIP |
MIDWEST GEOLOGICAL SEQUESTRATION CONSORTIUM |
MIDWEST REGIONAL CARBON SEQUESTRATION PARTNERSHIP |
PLAINS CO2 REDUCTION PARTNERSHIP |
SOUTHEAST REGIONAL CARBON SEQUESTRATION PARTNERSHIP |
SOUTHWEST REGIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOR CARBON SEQUESTRATION |
WEST COAST REGIONAL CARBON SEQUESTRATION PARTNERSHIP |
Chapter- 9: LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY DRIVERS
TABLE 135 PENDING U.S. FEDERAL LEGISLATION FOR CAPS ON CO2 AND OTHER GREENHOUSE GASES CAPTURE, 2007–2008 |
LEGISLATION FOR CCS FUNDING, INCENTIVES, AND TAX CREDITS |
TABLE 136 U.S. FEDERAL LEGISLATION FOR CCS FUNDING: INCENTIVES AND TAX CREDITS, 2007–2008 |
ADMINISTRATION |
EPA CO2 SEQUESTRATION RULES |
JUDICIAL |
U.S. SUPREME COURT RULES CO2 A POLLUTANT |
STATE LEGISLATION |
TABLE 137 U.S. STATES WITH CO2 REGULATIONS, 2007 |
FOREIGN REGULATION AND LEGISLATION |
KYOTO PROTOCOL |
EUROPEAN UNION |
CANADA |
LONDON PROTOCOL-SUBSEA CO2 REGULATIONS |
EUROPEAN CLIMATE EXCHANGE |
VOLUNTARY REGULATION |
Chicago Climate Exchange, Inc. |
Chapter- 10: COMPANY PROFILES
PRE-COMBUSTION COMPANIES |
AGRIUM, INC. |
Agrium U.S., Inc. |
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER |
BAARD ENERGY |
Nordic Energy of Ashtabula, LLC |
BABCOCK & BROWN |
Babcock & Brown (U.S.) |
BABCOCK POWER, INC. |
Vogt Power International, Inc. |
BASIN ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE |
BECHTEL |
BLACK & VEATCH CORP. |
BP |
BP Alternative Energy |
BUFFALO ENERGY PARTNERS CO., LLC |
BURNS AND ROE |
CANSOLV |
CHEVRONTEXACO |
CHRISTIAN COUNTY GENERATION, LLC |
CLEAN COAL POWER RESOURCES |
CME INTERNATIONAL |
CONOCOPHILLIPS |
DAKOTA GASIFICATION CO. |
DENBURY RESOURCES, INC. |
DKRW ADVANCED FUELS, LLC |
DUKE ENERGY |
EDISON MISSION ENERGY |
EL PASO CORP. |
ENERGY EXPEDITERS, INC. |
ENERGY NORTHWEST |
E.ON |
EPCO CARBON DIOXIDE |
EPCOR |
ERORA GROUP |
EXCEL ENERGY |
EXCELSIOR ENERGY |
FIRST ENERGY CONSOL |
First Energy |
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
FOSTER WHEELER |
FOSTER WHEELER ITALIANA |
GE ENERGY |
GLOBAL ENERGY, INC. |
GREAT LAKES ENERGY RESEARCH PARK (GLERP) |
GREATPOINT ENERGY |
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. |
IDAHO POWER CO. |
J POWER |
KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT |
KENTUCKY PIONEER ENERGY, LLC |
LEUCADIA NATIONAL CORP. |
LURGI OEL•GAS•CHEMIE GMBH |
MADISON POWER CORP. |
MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES |
MONTGOMERY GREAT FALLS ENERGY PARTNERS, LP |
MOUNTAIN ISLAND ENERGY, LLC |
M&M ENERGY, LLC |
NORTHERN LIGHTS/SYNENCO |
NRG ENERGY |
ORLANDO UTILITIES COMMISSION |
OTTER CREEK |
PACIFIC CORP. |
PINION PINE |
POLK COUNTY POWER PLANT |
POWERFUEL, PLC |
REFINED ENERGY HOLDINGS, LLC (REH) |
Southeast Idaho Energy, LLC (SIE) |
RENTECH, INC. |
SHELL |
SHERRITT INTERNATIONAL |
SIEMENS POWER GENERATION GROUP |
SOUTHERN COMPANY SERVICES |
STEELHEAD ENERGY CO. |
SUMMIT POWER GROUP, INC. |
SYNTHESIS ENERGY SYSTEMS |
TAMPA ELECTRIC |
TEXAS ENERGY FUTURE HOLDINGS, LTD. PARTNERSHIP |
TONDU CORP. |
UHDE |
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS |
URS CORP. |
URS Corp. |
WABASH POWER STATION TERRE HAUTE INDIANA |
ZMMF |
OXY-COMBUSTION COMPANIES |
AIR LIQUIDE SOCIETE |
AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC. |
BOC GROUP, INC. |
CLEAN ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. |
CO2-GLOBAL, LLC |
DOOSAN BABCOCK ENERGY |
FRAZIER-SIMPLEX, INC. |
HISMELT CORP. |
INSTITUTE OF EARTH PHYSICS OF PARIS |
INSTITUT FRANCAIS DE PETROLE |
JUPITER OXYGEN |
NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY |
PRAXAIR |
VATTENFALL UTVECKLING AB |
VTT (TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND) |
POST-COMBUSTION COMPANIES |
ABB LUMMUS GLOBAL/KERR-MCGEE |
AKER KVAERNER ASA |
Aker Kvaerner (U.S.) |
AKER KVAERNER |
AIRGAS, INC. |
AIRGAS |
AIR LIQUIDE |
ALCOA |
ALSTOM |
AMEC |
ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORP. |
BASF |
BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE |
THE BEARD CO. |
BLUE SOURCE, LLC |
BRITISH PETROLEUM |
BW SHIPPING MANAGERS PTE, LTD. |
CHART INDUSTRIES |
COFFEYVILLE RESOURCES NITROGEN FERTILIZERS, LLC |
COMART SPA |
COOL ENERGY, LTD. |
CO2 TECH |
CO2CRC |
CO2REMOVE |
CRF PTY, LTD. |
CRYOGENIC CONSTRUCTION, INC. |
DOW |
EESTECH, INC. |
ENCANA |
ENEL S.P.A |
ENECOGEN |
ENHANCED OIL RESOURCES, INC. |
EPCO CARBON DIOXIDE PRODUCTS, INC. |
EVOLUTION PETROLEUM CORP. |
EXXON |
FALCON GAS STORAGE CO., INC. |
FLUOR |
GASSCO AS |
GE |
GIAMMARCO-VETROCOKE |
HARBIN ELECTRIC |
HUNTSMAN CORP. |
HYDROGEN ENERGY |
INDO GULF FERTILIZER CO. |
INEOS OXIDE, LTD. |
INTERNATIONAL POWER AUSTRALIA PTY, LTD. |
JAPAN OIL DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD. (JODCO) |
KINDER MORGAN ENERGY PARTNERS, LP |
LINDE |
LOTEPRO CORP. |
LUKOIL |
MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH, INC. |
MICELL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. |
NATCO CYNARA MEMBRANES |
NEWPOINT GAS SERVICES, INC. |
NIPPON SHOKUBAI CO., LTD. |
NORTH WEST UPGRADING, INC. |
OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM CORP. |
ORIENTAL UNION CHEMICAL CORP. |
POWERSPAN CORP. |
PRAXAIR |
PROCESS GROUP- HAZELWOOD 2030 |
QINGDAO GREAT CHEMICAL, INC. |
RANCHER ENERGY CORP. |
RIO TINTO |
R.R. STREET & CO., INC. |
RWE NPOWER |
SARGAS AS |
SASOL O&S |
SCHLUMBERGER |
SEMGREEN, LP |
SEMGROUP |
SHELL |
SINTEZ OKA, LLC |
STATOIL |
THERMOENERGY |
TOTAL ELF AFINA |
Total American Services, Inc. |
TOYO ENGINEERING CORP. |
TRANSCANADA CORP. |
TRINITY CO2, LLC |
TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER CO. |
U.K. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND ENTERPRISE |
UNIVERSAL INDUSTRIAL GASES, INC. |
UOP, LLC |
VATTENFALL AB |
W.L. GORE |
WINTERSHALL |
WALLULA RESOURCE RECOVERY |
WITTEMANN-CRYOGENIC INDUSTRIES GROUP |
Chapter- 11: APPENDIX
TABLE 138 |
ABBREVIATED MEASUREMENTS |
TABLE 139 |
CHEMICAL SYMBOLS |
TABLE 140 ACRONYMS |
Choose a currency below to display product prices in the selected currency.